Quick answer
Gelato 33 and Gelato 41 are commonly documented as numbered selections from the Gelato family, whose declared parentage is Sunset Sherbert × Thin Mint Cookies, also called Thin Mint GSC in later references. The numbers distinguish selections; they are not strength ratings.
Bacio Gelato is commonly used for Gelato #41. The names are discussed together because they describe closely related parts of the same Gelato family. A 2017 interview documents Mr. Sherbinski and Jigga's shared role in the original project, but it does not prove that every later sample using one of these names has identical chemistry.
The Gelato family and its origin record
In a 2017 Cannabis Now interview, Mr. Sherbinski described working with Jigga on a pollination project involving Sunset Sherbert and Thin Mint Cookies. The resulting seeds became Gelato. He explained that the plants in the propagation project were numbered, including the selections later known publicly as 33 and 41. A 2020 Newsweed interview also records his explanation that the familiar Gelato numbers came from the labels on his jars.
The evidence should be stated with care:
- Project attribution: Mr. Sherbinski and Jigga, based on an on-record interview with Mr. Sherbinski.
- Declared family parentage: Sunset Sherbert × Thin Mint Cookies; Thin Mint GSC is a common later wording.
- Gelato #33: a numbered selection within the family, often called Gelato 33.
- Gelato #41: a separate numbered selection, commonly associated with the name Bacio Gelato.
These records document naming and declared lineage. They do not verify the identity of an untested sample.
Gelato 33 vs Gelato 41
The most defensible difference is that #33 and #41 identify different selected expressions. They should not be presented as interchangeable, and neither number is a percentage, quality score or promise of intensity.
Online comparisons often assign fixed aromas, cannabinoid ranges and effects to each number. Those summaries usually combine results from different producers, environments, laboratories and markets. Without sample-level evidence, they cannot establish universal profiles.
Are Gelato 33 and 41 the same?
They are commonly treated as distinct numbered selections within the same Gelato family.
Is 41 stronger than 33?
The numbers are selection identifiers, not potency grades. Only a sample-specific test can support a potency comparison.
Is Bacio Gelato the same as Gelato 41?
The cited cultivar registry records it as an alias for Gelato #41, but the identity of any current sample still needs traceable provenance.
Do they have guaranteed effects?
No. A name cannot predict one person's response or every sample's composition.
Bacio Gelato and related names
SeedFinder records Bacio Gelato as “aka Gelato #41” and attributes it to Sherbinskis. Because SeedFinder is a secondary cultivar registry, this is alias evidence, not independent genetic testing. Bacio Gelato, Bacio and Gelato 41 are best understood together unless stronger primary records establish that a name refers to a separate selection.
Gelato #33 and Gelato #41 should keep the hash sign when discussing the original selection notation. The shorter forms Gelato 33 and Gelato 41 are also widely used. The family parent is often spelled Sunset Sherbert in breeder material, while Sunset Sherbet is a common variant spelling; both spellings refer to the same declared parent line in this context.
What can aroma descriptions tell us?
Gelato-family pages frequently use dessert, cream, fruit, earth or sweet language. Such terms can record a breeder's or producer's sensory description, but they are not a certificate of composition. The aroma of a particular sample depends on the compounds actually present and on post-harvest condition.
No fixed terpene list can be assigned responsibly to #33 or #41 without an identifiable analysis. Any terpene claim must be tied to a specific sample, method and date.
Is Gelato 33 or Gelato 41 Indica, Sativa or Hybrid?
They are widely described as hybrids. That label is too broad to answer questions about chemistry or experience. Research on commercial cannabis has found substantial overlap in the chemical profiles attached to Indica, Sativa and Hybrid labels. The family name and number provide historical context, not a reliable effect category.
What effects should someone expect?
The names do not predict them. Published brand and database descriptions often mix anecdote with marketing and may not apply across samples or people. Composition, amount, route, tolerance, context and individual response all matter. No Gelato name should be presented as a treatment or as suitable for a particular activity.
Related reading
Return to the cannabis strains guide, read the provenance record for Gary Payton, or review the guide to THC, CBD and other cannabinoids.
Sources
- Devine J. (2017). The Sherbinski Sitdown: A Comprehensive Guide to Gelato. Cannabis Now. On-record interview used for the collaborative project, declared parentage and explanation of the numbered selections; experiential and cultivation language excluded.
- Bernard A. (2020; updated 2023). Mr. Sherbinski: Breeding and giving back to the community. Newsweed. Interview used as corroboration for the family cross and numbered-container explanation.
- SeedFinder. Bacio Gelato by Sherbinskis. Secondary registry used for the Bacio Gelato / Gelato #41 alias; no potency or effect claims adopted.
- Watts S. et al. (2021). Cannabis labelling is associated with genetic variation in terpene synthase genes. Nature Plants.
- Smith C. J. et al. (2022). The phytochemical diversity of commercial Cannabis in the United States. PLOS ONE.
For the bigger picture: see how cannabis clubs in Barcelona actually work or how membership requests work at Club Guru.